Claims: Are the UN Sales Convention Rules Better?》,Reproduced with permission of 4 Canadian International Lawyer (2001) 187,http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu。
[12]如卖方破产并且其破产财产不足。
[13]Peter Schlechtriem(ed), 《Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods(CISG)》与Christian Rauda and Guillaume Etier:《Warranty for Intellectual Property Rightsin the International Sale of Goods》的观点不同 。
[14]如果情况有变,买方应将这种变化告知卖方。
[15]《巴黎公约》第9条(4)。
[16]语言不通等问题不足已成为借口。他可以委托一个专业人员如熟悉这方面的商业人士或律师等来替他履行这种职责。
[17]CISG CASE PRESENTATION,France 17 February 2000 Appellate Court Rouen (Société Ma... R.A.S. v. S.A. T... Diffusion) [translation available],[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000217f1.html],此案法官认为对卖方调查义务的要求因卖方的规模、类型而定。
[18]Joseph J. Schwerha IV:《Warranties against Infringement in the Sale of Goods: A Comparison of U.C.C. § 2-312(3) and Article 42 of the U.N. Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods》,Reproduced with permission from 16 Michigan J. Int'l L. (1995) 441-483,http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu。
[19]对此问题有一个比较失败的案例:CISG CASE PRESENTATION Israel 22 August 1993
[12]如卖方破产并且其破产财产不足。
[13]Peter Schlechtriem(ed), 《Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods(CISG)》与Christian Rauda and Guillaume Etier:《Warranty for Intellectual Property Rightsin the International Sale of Goods》的观点不同 。
[14]如果情况有变,买方应将这种变化告知卖方。
[15]《巴黎公约》第9条(4)。
[16]语言不通等问题不足已成为借口。他可以委托一个专业人员如熟悉这方面的商业人士或律师等来替他履行这种职责。
[17]CISG CASE PRESENTATION,France 17 February 2000 Appellate Court Rouen (Société Ma... R.A.S. v. S.A. T... Diffusion) [translation available],[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000217f1.html],此案法官认为对卖方调查义务的要求因卖方的规模、类型而定。
[18]Joseph J. Schwerha IV:《Warranties against Infringement in the Sale of Goods: A Comparison of U.C.C. § 2-312(3) and Article 42 of the U.N. Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods》,Reproduced with permission from 16 Michigan J. Int'l L. (1995) 441-483,http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu。
[19]对此问题有一个比较失败的案例:CISG CASE PRESENTATION Israel 22 August 1993
Supreme Court (Eximin v. Textile and Footwear) [Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930822i5.html]。
[20]上注的案例中讲诚信原则仅限于解释公约的原则而不认为其能适用于具体责任的认定中。
[21]上注的案例在此点上也反其道而行。







